Yankwich
C+
99% — 347.5 of 352 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 46% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Robinson v. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd.
- Joyce, Inc. v. Fern Shoe Co.
- Mode O'Day Corp. v. Rogan
- Neale v. Railroad Commission
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs
- Weeks v. Matson Nav. Co.
- Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.
- Joyce, Inc. v. Solnit
- Mantz v. Kersting
- Ex Parte Kurth
- Delaney Patents Corp. v. Johns-Manville
- Buxbom v. City of Riverside
- C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Food & Grocery Bureau of Southern California, Inc.
- Shonts v. Hirliman
- Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.
- Armature Exchange, Inc. v. United States
- In Re Farrow
- In re Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.
- In Re Wiegand
- In re Grodzins
- In re Corcoran Irr. Dist.
- Rok v. Legg
- Dorman v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
- Nicholson v. United States
- Stoody Co. v. Carlton Metals, Inc.