William v. Gallo
, District Court, S.D. California 2009–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 4 vacated 1 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2021 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Holestine v. R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
- Martinez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
- Aguirre-Valdivia v. Mastercorp, Inc.
- Phengthavy v. Saul
- United States v. Nelson
- Estate of Kevin Brown v. City of San Diego
- Hammler v. Aviles
- Hubbard v. Plaza Bonita, LP
- Provide Commerce, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
- Godfrey v. Saul
- Nordling v. Saul
- BRFS Investments, Inc. v. Amguard Insurance Company
- Salgado v. Iqvia, Inc.
- Toves v. Berryhill
- Javo Beverage Co., Inc. v. California Extraction Ventures, Inc.
- Jannuzzi v. General Motors LLC
- Daigle v. City of Oceanside
- Fisher v. Eddie Bauer, LLC
- Gonzalez v. Madden
- Seawood v. Berryhill
- Wheeler v. Marengo
- Jihan, Inc. v. Amco Insurance Company
- United States v. RAJMP, Inc.
- Carpio v. Saul
- United States v. RAJMP, Inc.