William v. Gallo
, District Court, S.D. California 2009–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 4 vacated 1 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2021 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Dawes v. The People of the State of California
- Dalrymple v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Nguyen v. Saul
- Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company
- Fergins v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
- Topete-Jasper v. Kijakazi
- Hozi v. Social Security Administrative SSA
- Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company
- Russell v. Kijakazi
- Hozi v. Social Security Administrative SSA
- Martinez v. University of San Diego
- Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company
- Scripps Health v. Nautilus Insurance Company
- Gonzalez v. Kijakazi
- Gopher Media LLC v. Melone
- Flynn v. Kijakazi
- Phelps v. Kijakazi
- Thompson v. Corelogic Rental Property Solutions, LLC
- Cadles of West Virginia, LLC v. Alvarez
- O'Neil v. Kijakazi
- Romero v. United States Department of Justice
- Faunce v. Covello
- Vasquez Rios v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Valles v. Allison
- De Alba v. Velocity Investments, LLC