William R. Daingerfield
38cases reviewed on appeal
46%reversed, in whole or part, of 13 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
other 25 reversed 6 affirmed 5 modified 2
Areas
By year: 1901 9 · 1900 7 · 1903 6 · 1902 6 · 1905 4 · 1904 3 · 1899 2 · 1927 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Drinkhouse v. Van Ness
- Leishman v. Union Iron Works
- Gardiner v. McDonogh
- Benjamin v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
- Abner Doble Co. v. McDonald
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. San Francisco Bridge Co.
- Barnum v. Cochrane
- American Fire Insurance v. Hart
- Doolin v. Omnibus Cable Co.
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Quill v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Barnum v. Cochrane
- San Francisco Lumber Co. v. Bibb
- City Street Improvement Co. v. Emmons
- Minaker v. California Canneries Co.
- Kernan v. Market-Street Railway Co.
- Yukon River Steamboat Co. v. Gratto
- Hainque v. Cyclops Iron Works
- Lathrope v. Flood
- De Prosse v. Royal Eagle Distilleries Co.
- Layng v. Mount Shasta Mineral Spring Co.
- Hall v. Kerrigan
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.
- Gorman v. Gorman
- Taussig v. Bode & Haslett