
Curtis D. Wilbur
Judge, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1929–1954 · Judge, California Supreme Court 1918–1924
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
363opinions authored
417panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Mayen
- Davie's v. Torrance
- Freeman v. Donohoe
- San Francisco Protestant Orphan Asylum Society v. Fitzsimmons
- In Re Estate of Withenbury
- Son v. Adamson
- Cotton-Macauley Co. v. Deshields
- Potter v. Chambers
- Schwab v. Richardson
- Stark v. Shemada
- Houghton v. Superior Court
- In Re Holmes
- More v. Hutchinson
- Sing v. Barker
- Bisinger v. Sacramento Lodge No. 6
- Franklin v. Churchill Co.
- Reynolds v. Churchill Co.
- Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.
- Torr v. United Railroads
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.
- People v. Steelik
- People v. Taylor
- Imperial Valley Land Co. v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.
- Kerr v. Reed
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.