
Curtis D. Wilbur
Judge, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1929–1954 · Judge, California Supreme Court 1918–1924
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
363opinions authored
417panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior Court
- Pacific States Securities Co. v. Steiner
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Collins
- City of Pasadena v. Chamberlain
- Mash v. Superior Court
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Superior Court
- Williams v. Edge
- First Federal Trust Co. v. Sanders
- City of Vallejo v. Scally
- In Re Mann
- Newport v. Superior Court
- Ashe v. Zemansky
- In Re Chutuk
- Sanders v. Toberman
- Franks v. Cesena
- Slayden v. O'Dea
- In Re Application of Silva
- Fletcher v. District Court of Appeal
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Garrison
- In Re Estate of Francis
- Santa Cruz Portland Cement Co. v. County of Santa Clara
- Thomas v. Gismegian
- Pomper v. Superior Court
- Tannahill v. Superior Court
- Shaingold v. Shaingold