
Curtis D. Wilbur
Judge, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 1929–1954 · Judge, California Supreme Court 1918–1924
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
363opinions authored
417panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.
- Collette v. Sarrasin
- Whiteman v. City of San Diego
- Crowe v. Boyle
- Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Hines v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Brown v. City of Los Angeles
- Huntington v. Donovan
- Huntington v. Donovan
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San Francisco
- Santa Barbara Lumber Co. v. Ross
- Ex Parte Daniels
- Walling v. Williams
- Coughlin v. Great Western Power Co.
- McNutt v. Hannon
- In Re Estate of Abbey
- Cohen v. City of Alameda
- Roth v. Reclamation District No. 1001
- Brimberry v. Dudfield Lumber Co.
- Lyon & Hoag v. Railroad Commission
- California National Supply Co. v. Flack
- Wilson v. Travelers' Insurance Co.
- Seaman v. Superior Court of Marin County
- Newman v. E. E. Overholtzer Sons' Co.
- Tipps v. Landers