Weinberger
F++
96% — 53.0 of 55 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 81% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Beauregard v. Wingard
- Brown v. United States
- Gray v. United States
- United States v. Taylor
- Pickett v. United States
- Diaz v. California Department of Corrections
- Arrizon v. United States
- United States v. Certain Lands in County of San Diego
- In Re Goodson
- In re Van Meter
- Pinto v. Tampo Largo
- First National Trust & Savings Bank of San Diego v. United States
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
- McVicker v. United States
- Gilmore v. Marietta Broadcasting, Inc.
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
- Home Indemnity Co., New York v. Lechner
- United States v. Bologna
- Vaughn v. United States
- Van Sickel v. United States
- United States v. Hortze
- United States v. Cervantes
- In Re Phillips'petition
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
- United States v. Hough