William T. Wallace
Judge, California Supreme Court 1869–1879
A-
provisional — 100% — 5.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Emerson v. County of Santa Clara
- McCoy v. California Pacific Railroad
- Himmelman v. Byrne
- Chambers v. Satterlee
- Rosencrantz v. Rogers
- Treat v. Forsyth
- Smith v. Council of Oakland
- Robinson v. Haas
- Taylor v. Underhill
- Paxson v. Holt
- Rovegno v. Defferari
- Felch v. Beaudry
- Morgan v. Stearns
- More v. Massini
- Phelps v. Davidson
- Flint v. Bell
- Peres v. Sunol
- Murdock v. Ware
- Mayo v. City of Sacramento
- Merle v. Meagher
- Ex parte Ah Cha
- Hastings v. Devlin
- Alemany v. Wensinger
- Mayo v. Foley
- Fulton v. Hanna