Turrentine
D
97% — 38.0 of 39 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 69% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- McClintock v. Robinson
- Masters v. Board of Dental Examiners
- Shlaudeman v. Grubel
- Miller v. Roach
- Security Investment Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.
- Security Investment Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.
- Marts v. Marts
- Security Investment Co. v. Bieg-Hoffine Co.
- Estate of Grussing
- Long v. Superior Court
- In Re Bruns
- Vincent v. Garland
- People v. Reyes
- People v. Baillie
- Tomlinson v. Kiramidjian
- Irving v. Irwin
- Smith v. Taecker
- Bender v. Lamb
- Row v. Biehl
- Dyer v. Hunter