Tony Raphael
B+
76% — 19 of 25 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 24% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
34cases reviewed on appeal
18%reversed, in whole or part, of 28 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 22 writ granted 4 reversed in part 4 remanded 2 reversed 1 modified 1
Areas
criminal 22 delinquency 6 civil 6
By year: 2023 9 · 2026 6 · 2022 6 · 2021 5 · 2024 4 · 2025 2 · 2020 2 ·
Analysis
18reviewed cases analysed
64rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
5cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Nassman v. Super. Ct.
- Perez v. Cascade Drilling CA4/1
- Winslett v. Dothan Security CA4/1
- The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Ct.
- The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Court
- The Merchant of Tennis v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Hidalgo CA4/2
- People v. Brock CA4/2
- People v. Dingman CA4/1
- People v. E.C. CA4/2
- In re Miguel R.
- In re Miguel R.
- People v. Hernandez CA4/1
- People v. Hampton CA4/2
- In re W.T. CA4/2
- In re J.P.
- People v. Mercado CA2/3
- In re S.G. CA4/2
- People v. Manago CA4/2
- People v. Oliva
- People v. Brock CA4/2
- People v. Rivota CA4/1
- People v. Hernandez CA4/1
- People v. Youngs CA4/1
- People v. Hidalgo CA4/2