Timothy J. Hollenhorst
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2018–
B++
provisional — 78% — 7 of 9 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 21% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 9 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
32cases reviewed on appeal
19%reversed, in whole or part, of 31 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 24 reversed in part 3 reversed 3 writ granted 1 modified 1
Areas
By year: 2024 9 · 2026 6 · 2025 5 · 2023 4 · 2021 4 · 2020 3 · 2022 1 ·
Analysis
12reviewed cases analysed
34rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
1cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Jongewaard CA4/2
- People v. Bustamante CA4/1
- People v. Gutierrez CA4/2
- People v. Jimenez CA4/1
- People v. Gutierrez CA4/1
- People v. Lafourche CA4/2
- People v. Ramirez CA4/1
- People v. Gee CA4/1
- In re Lopez CA4/2
- People v. Temple
- People v. Temple
- People v. Naranjo CA4/2
- People v. Matos CA4/2
- People v. Ropele CA4/2
- People v. Mack CA4/3
- People v. Ozuna CA4/2
- People v. Berber CA4/3
- People v. Hicks CA4/3
- People v. Zuniga CA4/1
- People v. Robinson CA4/3
- People v. Magana CA4/2
- People v. Perez CA4/2
- People v. Viramontes CA4/2
- People v. Thomas CA4/2
- People v. Acosta CA4/2