Thomas S. Garza
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino 2007–
F
provisional — 44% — 4 of 9 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 89% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 9 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
23cases reviewed on appeal
26%reversed, in whole or part, of 23 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 17 reversed 4 reversed in part 2
Areas
civil 19 delinquency 3 criminal 1
By year: 2022 5 · 2014 3 · 2013 3 · 2026 2 · 2024 2 · 2021 2 · 2016 2 · 2015 2 · 2025 1 · 2020 1 ·
Analysis
6 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Salmer v. Southern Cal. Permanente Medical Group CA4/1
- Schwenker v. Silberfein CA4/2
- Venegar v. Dignity Health CA4/1
- Symons Emergency Specialties v. City of Riverside CA4/2 Case Details
- Symons Emergency Specialties v. City of Riverside CA4/2
- Barth v. City of Chino CA4/2
- Hoang v. Arrowhead Woods Architectural Committee CA4/1
- Lee v. Barrigan CA4/2
- King v. Mabaquio CA4/2
- Dominguez v. Costco Wholesale Corp. CA4/2
- LG Aviation v. Kimbrell CA4/2
- Arrieta v. Snowline Joint Unified School Dist. CA4/2
- Tanriverdi v. County of San Bernardino CA4/2
- Chatman v. Arrowhead Credit Union CA4/2
- Bhinder v. KF Ontario LLC CA4/2
- Hsu v. Prime Healthcare Services III CA4/2
- First Mortgage v. Cal. Casualty Ins. CA4/2
- Pacific Trust Bank v. England CA4/2
- People v. London
- GMAC Mortgage v. Sandoval CA4/2
- In re S.P. CA4/2
- In re D.G. CA4/2
- In re K.H. CA4/2