Thomas J. Whelan
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 42 reversed 10 reversed in part 4 vacated 3
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 4 other 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2010 16 · 2008 6 · 2021 5 · 2019 5 · 2018 4 · 2011 4 · 2007 3 · 2005 3 · 2025 2 · 2024 2 · 2023 2 · 2020 2 · 2012 2 · 2006 2 · 2002 2 · 2026 1 · 2022 1 · 2017 1 · 2015 1 · 2004 1 · 2001 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Dickman
- Delgadillo v. O'Malley
- Bernal v. County of San Diego
- Diaz v. O'Malley
- Donahue v. Saul
- Strickland v. O'Malley
- Ober v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Blue Line Foodservice Distribution, Inc. v. Cathcart
- Bernal v. County of San Diego
- Freedom Forever Procurement LLC v. Silfab Solar Inc.
- Schmidt v. County of San Diego
- United States v. Chipunov
- Gale v. Unifi Aviation, LLC
- Moran v. Kijakazi
- Thompson v. Government Employees Insurance Company
- Walpert v. Solar Integrated Roofing Corp.
- United States v. Schaedler-Moore
- Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc.
- Asencio v. City of San Diego
- Wally v. Kijakazi
- Lynk Remote Technologies, LLC v. Sky Harbour, LLC