Thomas J. Whelan
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 42 reversed 10 reversed in part 4 vacated 3
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 4 other 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2010 16 · 2008 6 · 2021 5 · 2019 5 · 2018 4 · 2011 4 · 2007 3 · 2005 3 · 2025 2 · 2024 2 · 2023 2 · 2020 2 · 2012 2 · 2006 2 · 2002 2 · 2026 1 · 2022 1 · 2017 1 · 2015 1 · 2004 1 · 2001 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Castro
- United States v. Vences
- United States v. Randall Treadwell
- United States v. Mark Forrester
- Le v. Astrue
- Duarte v. Bardales
- Manta v. Chertoff
- Silvas v. Etrade
- United States v. Calderon-Segura
- United States v. Forrester
- United States v. Forrester
- United States v. Forrester
- United States v. Gomez-Mendez
- United States v. Ballesteros-Selinger
- United States v. Cervantes-Flores
- Thomas v. Fry's Electronics
- United States v. Cortez-Rocha
- No. 02-57006
- Dsam Global Value Fund v. Altris Software, Inc.
- Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc. v. Surgical Technologies, Inc.
- Defenders Of Wildlife v. Norton