Jackson Temple
Justice, Court of Appeal · Supreme Court of California · 1870–1903
Judge, California Supreme Court 1870–1872
901panels sat on (not as author)
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Maurer v. King S.F. No. 1754. · 1899-12-08 · civil · other
- Ex Parte Knapp Crim. No. 597. · 1899-12-05 · other
- People v. Valliere Crim. No. 486. · 1899-11-28 · criminal · reversed
- Snibley v. Palmtag S.F. No. 1902. · 1899-11-22 · civil · other
- Bowering v. Adams L.A. No. 754. · 1899-11-10 · civil
- Boyd v. Southern California Ry. Co. L.A. No. 544. · 1899-11-06 · civil · reversed
- McGuirre v. Lynch Sac. No. 524. · 1899-11-06 · civil · affirmed
- Odell v. Buttrick Sac. No. 556. · 1899-11-06 · civil · affirmed
- Fragley v. Phelan S.F. 2048. · 1899-10-23 · civil · affirmed
- San Jose Ranch Co. v. San Jose Land & Water Co. L.A. No. 491. · 1899-10-19 · civil · reversed
- Edelman v. McDonell L.A. No. 531. · 1899-09-28 · civil · other
- Alferitz v. Borgwardt L.A. No. 527. · 1899-09-26 · civil · affirmed
- California Bank v. Brooks L.A. No. 569. · 1899-09-23 · civil · other
- Rogers v. Superior Court of Riverside County S.F. No. 1889. · 1899-09-23 · civil
- Westall v. Altschul S.F. No. 876. · 1899-09-19 · civil · reversed
- Sweasey v. Sweasey S.F. No. 796. · 1899-09-15 · civil · affirmed
- Dow v. Swain S. F. No. 1144 · 1899-09-06 · civil
- Sherwood v. Kyle S. F. No. 974 · 1899-09-06 · civil
- Hennesey v. Bingham S. F. No. 995 · 1899-09-05 · civil
- Hamilton v. Smith S. F. No. 1023 · 1899-08-07 · civil
- Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. S. F. No. 1164 · 1899-07-29 · civil
- In re Estate of Crooks S. F. No. 1607 · 1899-07-25 · probate
- In re Straut S. F. No. 1185 · 1899-07-21 · other
- In re Clarke Crim. No. 536 · 1899-07-17 · civil
- Burk v. Arcata & Mad River Railroad S. F. No. 1121 · 1899-07-14 · civil