Sammartino
A-
100% — 30.0 of 30 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Ordonez v. United States
- United States v. Huping Zhou
- SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.
- United States v. Jose Medina-Rivera
- United States v. Edgar Srapyan
- Page v. Tri-City Healthcare District
- Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. MOC Products Co.
- SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.
- Janopaul + Block Companies v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
- Weiland Sliding Doors & Windows, Inc. v. Panda Windows & Doors, LLC
- Milton Plummer v. E. McDaniel
- Anna Piatz v. Commissioner of Social Securit
- Jeremy Atwell v. City of Surprise
- In re National Western Life Insurance Deferred Annuities Litigation
- Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC
- Weigele v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
- Lewis v. Ryan