Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Wilmington Transp. Co. v. The Old Kensington
- Luttke v. The Brucklay Castle
- United States v. Cook
- In re Kays
- United States v. McKenzie
- Plummer v. Woodruff
- People v. McDowell
- Breeze v. Brooks
- City of San Francisco v. Heynemann
- Williams v. Southern Pacific Railroad
- Sherman v. Finch
- People v. Salvador
- Flournoy v. Van Campen
- Kern Valley Water Co. v. McCord
- People v. Franklin
- Table Mountain & San Andreas Water Co. v. Chavanne
- Palmer v. Uncas Mining Co.
- Davisson v. Board of Supervisors
- People v. Clunie
- Porter v. Murray
- Smith v. Furnish
- Peterson v. Weissbein
- Terney v. Doten
- Curtis v. Superior Court
- Ex parte Winter