Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Hassey v. Wilke
- McLeran v. McNamara
- Earle v. Board of Education of San Francisco
- Sigourney v. Zellerbach
- Davis v. Rock Creek L. F. & M. Co.
- Nelson v. McClanahan
- In re Baker & Hamilton
- People v. Mahoney
- Dickenson v. Bolyer
- Humphreys v. Harkey
- Eddelbuttel v. Durrell
- Myers v. Spooner
- Parks v. Barney
- Harper v. Rowe
- Curtis v. Parks
- People v. Hodgdon
- Haynes v. White
- Tompkins v. Sprout
- People v. Green
- Pac. Bridge Co. v. Kirkham
- People v. Houston
- Parrott v. Floyd
- McCool v. Mahoney
- Williams v. Hartford Ins. Co.
- Hill v. Finnigan