Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Akhay Kumar Mozumdar v. States
- Piacenza v. United States
- Page v. United States
- Fannon v. United States
- Rialto Irr. Dist. v. Chellis
- Yick v. United States
- Ward v. Rogers Bros.
- Crane v. Johnson
- Benson Lumber Co. v. McCann
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Postal Telegraph Co.
- Ex parte Graham
- Perris Irr. Dist. v. Turnbull
- Peralta v. California
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States
- Chin Man Can v. United States
- New Liverpool Salt Co. v. Wellborn
- Holt v. California Development Co.
- Fogarty v. Southern Pac. Co.
- United States v. Southern Pac. R.
- Eyeleth v. Southern California Ry. Co.
- Buckley v. Crane
- Harvey v. United States
- United States v. Chung Shee
- Wong Fong v. United States