Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Butcher v. Vaca Valley Railroad
- Osgood v. El Dorado Water & Deep Gravel Mining Co.
- Hubbell v. Campbell
- Dougherty v. Haggin
- Meeks v. Southern Pacific Railroad
- Simmons v. Hamilton
- Hirshfield v. Central Pacific RailRoad
- Lake v. Tebbitts
- Carpenteria School District v. Heath
- Estate of Keane
- Cumens v. Cyphers
- Wells v. Harter
- Santa Cruz Bank of Savings v. Cooper
- Taylor v. North Pacific Coast Railroad
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Hayes
- Chapman v. Quinn
- Smer v. Duggan
- Greer v. Tripp
- Estate of Martin
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. State Board of Equalization
- Anderson v. Taylor
- Barton v. Kalloch
- Knight v. Roche
- City of San Jose v. Freyschlag
- Hinkle v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad