Ross
F--
91% — 29.0 of 32 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 99% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Tansman v. Faris
- Logan v. Talbot
- People v. De Silvera
- Wedel v. Herman
- de Arnaz v. Escandon
- Love v. Mabury
- Ex parte Hope
- People v. Barnhart
- People v. Marshall
- People v. Higgins
- People v. Brown
- Hutchinson v. Hutchinson
- Condict v. Police Court
- People v. O'Neil
- Mulligan v. Smith
- Estate of Bulmer
- Biggins v. Champlin
- Sturgis v. Galindo
- People v. Parks
- Nichols v. Dunphy
- Farmers' National Gold Bank v. Wilson
- Shinn v. Macpherson
- Wood v. Board of Election Commissioners
- Shattuck v. Oakland Smelting & Refining Co.
- Estate of Dunne