Ronald S. Prager
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 1989–2017 · , Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 1988–1989
B-
70% — 85 of 121 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 36% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
55cases reviewed on appeal
27%reversed, in whole or part, of 49 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 36 reversed 7 reversed in part 6 writ granted 4 writ denied 1 other 1
Areas
By year: 2013 17 · 2015 13 · 2016 11 · 2014 5 · 1993 3 · 2017 1 · 2009 1 · 2007 1 · 2004 1 · 1998 1 · 1994 1 ·
Analysis
103reviewed cases analysed
375rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
17cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.
- Thaxton v. State Personnel Board
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.
- Century Surety Co. v. Motz CA4/1
- Preserve Poway v. City of Poway CA4/1
- North Park Preservation Coalition v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San Diego
- Preserve Poway v. City of Poway
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- City of San Diego v. Super. Ct.
- Nabizadeh v. Physical Therapy Board of CA CA4/1
- Rosales v. State of California, Dept. of Transportation CA4/1
- City of San Diego v. Superior Court CA4/1
- In re Tobacco Cases II
- Pinnock v. Gotti CA4/1
- Marshall v. County of San Diego
- One Easy Loan v. Wei CA4/1
- Moore v. City of Lemon Grove
- Shames v. Peffer CA4/1
- Singleton v. Amazon.com CA4/1
- Gorman v. Dwyer CA4/1
- CREED-21 v. City of San Diego
- Creed 21 v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Fredericks v. Superior Court
- Lane v. Bell CA4/1