Ronald L. Styn
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2000–
B-
71% — 92 of 130 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 34% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
69cases reviewed on appeal
36%reversed, in whole or part, of 64 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 39 reversed 17 reversed in part 6 writ granted 4 modified 2 writ denied 1
Areas
civil 65 family 2 probate 1 criminal 1
By year: 2014 10 · 2021 9 · 2015 9 · 2013 8 · 2022 7 · 2016 7 · 2020 6 · 2017 6 · 2018 3 · 2023 1 · 2019 1 · 2007 1 · 2004 1 ·
Analysis
130reviewed cases analysed
423rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
26cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- California Valley Miwok Tribe v. California Gambling Control Commission
- Frost St. Med. Associates v. San Diego Internal Med. Group CA4/1
- S.A. v. Maiden
- S.A. v. Maiden
- Woodruff v. County of San Diego In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority CA4/1
- Carroll v. Arthroscopic & Laser Surgery Center of San Diego CA4/1
- Kalikas v. American Contractors Indemnity Co. CA4/1
- Personalized Workout of La Jolla v. Ravet CA4/1
- Personalized Workout of La Jolla v. Ravet CA4/1
- Pacific Corp. Group Holdings v. Morris CA4/1
- Borrelli v. Scott CA4/1
- Pacific Millennium v. Central Valley Ranch CA4/1
- Bates v. Chicago Title Co. CA4/1
- Do v. The Regents of the University of California
- Business Advisors v. Chicago Title Ins. CA4/1
- Do v. The Regents of the University of California CA4/1
- Church v. Marshalls of CA CA4/1
- Alford v. County of San Diego
- Pitzen v. Superior Court