Robert Steven Huie
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 13 vacated 2 reversed in part 2 dismissed 2 reversed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 5 reversed in part 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 6 · 2024 5 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLC
- Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.
- Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLC
- Thomas v. Aguilar
- Munoz Perez v. Kajjy
- Grimes v. Enterpise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles, LLC.
- Brooks v. Bank of America, NA
- Hucker v. Daub
- Brown v. Acutus Medical, Inc.
- Brinkley v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
- Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation
- Brinkley v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
- Avalyn Pharma, Inc. v. Vincent
- Petersen v. FCA US LLC