Robert Steven Huie
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 13 vacated 2 reversed in part 2 dismissed 2 reversed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 5 reversed in part 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 6 · 2024 5 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Sharon Rosette
- United States v. Medina-Luna
- Mascorro v. The City of San Diego
- Nosirrah Management, LLC v. Franklin Wireless Corp.
- Meyer v. County of San Diego
- Mascorro v. The City of San Diego
- Tracy v. 1835 Columbia Street LP
- Tracy v. 1835 Columbia Street LP
- Craig v. American Tuna Inc.
- Grimes v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of Los Angeles LLC
- E.V.E. v. Grossmont Union High School District
- Scott v. Cates
- Loyal Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Taskoob, Inc.
- Raiser v. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Wellons v. PNS Stores, Inc.
- Martinez v. National EWP, Inc.
- Barajas Centeno v. City of Carlsbad
- Odanga v. Jordar
- Gross v. The City of San Diego
- Verdugo v. City of Calexico
- Hernandez v. Newsom
- Haeussinger v. Gore
- Friends of Del Mar Bluffs v. North County Transit District
- Lucero v. City of San Diego
- Hernandez v. Newsom