Robert Steven Huie
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 13 vacated 2 reversed in part 2 dismissed 2 reversed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 5 reversed in part 1 dismissed 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 12 · 2026 6 · 2024 5 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Mora v. Montgomery
- Gastelum v. Nordstrom, Inc.
- Bonilla v. Bashant
- Murillo v. Smith
- Chavarry v. San Diego County Jail Medical Staff
- Sumana Forest Retreat v. County of San Diego, California
- CV Amalgamated LLC v. City of Chula Vista
- Susan Pitt v. Metropolitan Tower Life Insurance Company
- Escondido Union High School District v. Aloy
- Mascorro v. The City of San Diego
- Fletcher v. General Motors, LLC
- Ford v. Isagenix International, LLC
- Brooke v. Orli La Jolla Re LLC
- E.C.D v. San Diego Unified School District
- Estes v. County of San Diego
- Mascorro v. The City of San Diego
- Coleman v. United Services Automobile Association
- Evans Hotels, LLC v. Unite Here! Local 30
- Verduzco v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR)
- Young v. Espino
- Silva v. Sayer
- Carnes v. Dexcom Inc.
- Oakland County Employees' Retirement System v. Dexcom, Inc.
- Alonzo v. Dexcom Inc.
- Samesurf, Inc. v. Intuit, Inc.