Raquel A. Marquez
B
73% — 8 of 11 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 30% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
20cases reviewed on appeal
28%reversed, in whole or part, of 18 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 13 reversed 4 writ granted 2 reversed in part 1
Areas
By year: 2026 4 · 2024 4 · 2018 4 · 2025 3 · 2021 2 · 2023 1 · 2019 1 · 2016 1 ·
Analysis
10reviewed cases analysed
31rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
2cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Bates v. City of Temecula CA4/1
- Bates v. City of Temecula CA4/1
- Montego Riverside County Homeowners Assn. v. Deutsche Bank etc. CA4/1
- Long v. Hemet Unified School Dist. CA4/1
- Swinerton Builders v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Norris v. 1st Lending Solutions CA4/1
- Vinkov v. Brotherhood Mutual Ins. Co. CA4/2
- Occhipinti v. Allen CA4/3
- Galyardt v. Specialized Loan Servicing CA4/2
- MGP IX Properties v. Towfix CA4/2
- Wang v. Iverson CA4/2
- Feast American Diners v. Lake Region Restaurants CA4/1
- Reilly v. Sanchez CA4/2
- Luzuriaga v. R.C. Berger Construction CA4/2
- Huckey v. City of Temecula
- J.W. v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.
- Bear Creek Master Assn. v. Southern Cal. Investors, Inc.
- Padda v. Super. Ct.
- Meeks v. AutoZone, Inc.
- Chase Bank v. Arbogast CA4/2