Randall S. Stamen
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2017–
F--
provisional — 22% — 2 of 9 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 99% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 9 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
22cases reviewed on appeal
38%reversed, in whole or part, of 21 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 13 reversed in part 4 reversed 4 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2023 8 · 2020 6 · 2022 4 · 2025 2 · 2021 2 ·
Analysis
10reviewed cases analysed
25rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
0cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Wickline v. Schweder CA4/1
- Miller v. Cabrera CA4/2
- People v. Sanchez CA4/1
- People v. Addison CA4/2
- People v. Carter
- Wickline v. Schweder CA4/1
- People v. Brown CA4/2
- People v. Campbell CA4/2
- People v. Sanchez CA4/1
- People v. Morgan
- Tye v. Papp CA4/2
- Peterson v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company etc. CA4/2
- Roe v. County of Orange CA4/2
- Solis v. MVP Cars CA4/2
- Tye v. Papp CA4/2
- Root v. State of California CA4/2
- Trans World Sourcing v. Prend CA4/2
- Trans World Sourcing v. Prend CA4/2
- Hudack v. Siggard CA4/2
- Wheat v. City of Corona CA4/2
- Crawford v. Comm. on Prof. Competence etc.
- North Murrieta Community, LLC v. City of Murrieta