O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Underwood CA4/1
- People v. Vargas CA4/1
- People v. Hune CA4/1
- People v. Gist CA4/1
- People v. Atkinson CA4/1
- M.C. v. W.G. CA4/1
- People v. Bringas CA4/1
- Alphatec Spine v. NuVasive CA4/1
- People v. Hijazi CA4/1
- Pongs v. City of Riverside CA4/1
- Davis v. Corvel Corp. CA4/1
- Elasali v. Phillips CA4/1
- People v. Arthur CA4/1
- V.S. v. P.D. CA4/1
- In re A.G. CA4/1
- People v. Garvey CA4/1
- People v. Macias CA4/1
- In re D.M. CA4/1
- People v. German CA4/1
- San Diego Police Officers' Assn. v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Smith v. Stater Bros. Markets CA4/1
- People v. Snider CA4/1
- In re M.C. CA4/1
- General Dynamics NASSCO v. Cal. OSHA Board CA4/1
- Ace Design & Construction v. MAA Palm Desert Hospitality CA4/1