O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Davis CA4/1
- In re B.R. CA4/1
- People v. Elias CA4/1
- Valderas v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Codinha
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- People v. Chaidez CA4/1
- MedImpact Healthcare Systems v. Cal. Dept. of Health Care Services CA4/1
- In re N.W. CA4/1
- In re A.M. CA4/1
- People v. McMillan CA4/1
- Law Offices of Benjamin Pavone v. Willis CA4/1
- Neurelis, Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
- Smart v. San Dieguito Union High School Dist. CA4/1
- The Inns by the Sea v. Cal. Mutual Ins. Co.
- People v. Jacome CA4/1
- Moreno v. Moreno CA4/1
- People v. Artale CA4/1
- Albertini v. Acebo-Houlihan CA4/1
- Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians etc. v. Flynt
- In re Ar.M. CA4/1
- In re C.T. CA4/1
- Marriage of Martinez CA4/1
- Otay Land Co. v. UE Limited CA4/1
- Marriage of Hamelynck CA4/1