O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re E.P. CA4/1
- CBRE v. Super. Ct.
- Maraziti v. Wilmington Trust, Nat. Assn. CA4/1
- Teague v. Easton CA4/1
- People v. Hurst CA4/1
- Young v. City of Coronado CA4/1
- People v. Hunter CA4/1
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. Dept. of Industrial Relations CA4/1
- People v. Grey CA4/1
- People v. Bender CA4/1
- Braemar Partnership v. County of San Deigo CA4/1
- People v. Scribner CA4/1
- Teague v. Easton CA4/1
- People v. Financial Casualty & Surety CA4/1
- The Regents of the U. of Cal. v. He CA4/1
- Marriage of Filipp CA4/1
- M.M. v. C.S. CA4/1
- Dopp v. Now Optics CA4/1
- People v. Dearborn CA4/1
- People v. Velasquez CA4/1
- County of San Diego v. B.M. CA4/1
- People v. Burns CA4/1
- Helm v. City of Los Angeles
- In re R.R. CA4/1