O'Neill
A+
provisional — 100% — 6.0 of 6 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 6% of 27 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 6 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Toho-Towa Co. v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc.
- National Football League v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
- People v. Vasilyan
- Vaughn v. LJ International, Inc.
- Mintz v. Blue Cross of California
- People v. Felix
- McConnell v. Innovative Artists Talent & Literary Agency, Inc.
- People v. Roa
- A.N. v. County of Los Angeles
- Budrow v. Dave & Buster's of California, Inc.
- Cleveland v. Internet Specialties West, Inc.
- People v. Gadlin
- People v. Diaz
- Reyes v. Kosha
- Ludwig v. City of San Diego
- PAULETTO v. Reliance Ins. Co.
- Pauletto v. Reliance Insurance
- Rainbow Disposal Co. v. Escondido Mobilehome Rent Review Board
- San Diego Unified Port v. U.S. Citizens Patrol