Moskowitz
B+
99% — 74.5 of 75 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 26% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
76opinions authored
103panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1997 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Zarco v. Burt
- Partnoy v. Shelley
- Benton v. Ashcroft
- United States v. $500,000 in U.S. Currency
- Loritz v. CMT BLUES
- Jardines-Guerra v. Ashcroft
- Karras v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
- Gordon v. Reliant Energy, Inc.
- Germann v. Vulcan Materials Co.
- Barker-Hatch v. Viejas Group Baron Long Capitan Grande Band of Digueno Mission Indians of Viejas Group Reservation
- United States v. Biao
- Diaz-Zaldierna v. Fasano
- Meoli v. American Medical Services of San Diego
- Murphey v. Lanier
- United States v. Juvenile
- Fluid Components Intl. v. Corporate Benefit Consultants
- Leventhal v. Vista Unified School District
- Castaneda v. Baldan
- Upper Deck Authenticated, Ltd. v. CPG DIRECT
- Springfield v. San Diego Unified Port District
- Luce v. Dalton
- Feigel v. Federal Deposit Insurance
- Greene v. Prunty
- Young v. United States
- Petition of France for Extradition of Sauvage