Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Wu v. Zhong CA1/2
- Ruegg & Ellsworth v. City of Berkeley
- DeCarava v. Barrager CA1/2
- Haffner v. Perez CA1/2
- Gostev v. Skillz Platform
- People v. Saeed CA1/2
- People v. Wilson CA1/2
- People v. Mantynen CA1/2
- People v. Davis-Murray CA1/2
- People v. Clotfelter CA1/2
- Degala v. John Stewart Company
- People v. Ornelas
- Degala v. John Stewart Company CA1/2
- People v. McCloud CA1/2
- Tate v. Chavez CA1/2
- Sarah K. v. Super. Ct.
- Doe v. Finke
- In re Foster
- People v. Meredith CA1/2
- People v. Johnson CA1/2
- People v. Saldana CA1/2
- In re Foster
- People v. Thornton CA1/2
- People v. Thornton CA1/2
- Westport Village etc. v. Khanna CA1/2