Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re N.C. CA1/2
- People v. Casillas CA1/2
- Nassiri v. City of Lafayette
- People v. Clotfelter CA1/2
- People v. Taylor CA1/2
- In re N.B. CA1/2
- Practice Fusion v. Freedom Specialty Ins. Co. CA1/2
- People v. Morales
- People v. Wertz CA1/2
- People v. Walker CA1/2
- Williams v. J-M Manufacturing Company
- People v. Rayl CA1/2
- Kime v. Dignity Health, Inc.
- Kime v. Dignity Health CA1/2
- Stebbins v. Cal. Public Utilities Commission CA1/2
- In re I.B. CA1/2
- People v. Ulmer CA1/2
- People v. Singer CA1/2
- People v. Ruskauff CA1/2
- People v. Dain
- People v. Underwood
- Weiblen v. Bowie CA1/2
- People v. Hilliard CA1/2
- Southwick v. Contractors State License Board CA1/2
- Ilumin v. Leach CA1/2