Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Nguyen v. Harsaghy CA1/2
- Malikyar v. Jacobsen CA1/2
- People v. Pamela CA1/2
- People v. Bravo
- Sarkany v. West CA1/2
- People v. Sims CA1/2
- People v. Davis
- People v. Davis CA1/2
- People v. Deroboam CA1/2
- People v. Rivera CA1/2
- People v. V.A. CA1/2
- In re Rylee P. CA1/2
- Bath v. State of Cal.
- People v. Royal
- Noyes v. Davis CA1/2
- Roy v. Roy CA1/2
- Bath v. State of Cal. CA1/2
- ProcureNet Limited v. Twitter CA1/2
- People v. Gordon CA1/2
- Plummer v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals CA1/2
- A.H. v. Tamalpais Union High School Dist.
- Creditor's Adjustment Bureau v. Bathe CA1/2
- Gordon v. Sodexo CA1/2
- Roxanne R. v. Superior Court CA1/2
- Russell v. Eytan CA1/2