Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga
- People v. Sweeney
- P.S. v. San Bernardino City Unified School District
- Weston Reid, LLC v. American Insurance Group, Inc.
- People v. Gerold
- People v. Hopkins
- City of Corona v. Naulls
- Laabs v. City of Victorville
- Villanueva v. City of Colton
- Ste. Marie v. Riverside Cty. Regional Park
- City of Riverside v. Stansbury
- People v. Mares
- Voris v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.
- Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda v. City of Alameda
- Teahan v. Wilhelm
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hometown Buffet, Inc.
- In Re National Western Life Insurance Deferred Annuities Litigation
- People v. Lewis
- United States v. Coronado
- Hoxie v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In Re Hoxie)
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.
- Raufi v. Chertoff
- Bovarie v. Giurbino
- In Re Remec Incorporated Securities Litigation
- In Re Remec Inc. Securities Litigation