Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Twenty-Nine Palms Enterprises Corp. v. Bardos
- Edwards v. Gillis
- City of Colton v. Singletary
- United States v. Green
- In re Jiffy Lube International, Inc., Text Spam Litigation
- Tilikum v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment, Inc.
- White v. Mabus
- Lewis Operating Corp. v. Superior Court
- Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities Agency
- Plancich v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
- Mansur v. Ford Motor Co.
- People v. Arevalo-Iraheta
- Rosencrans v. Dover Images, Ltd.
- FORCE FRAMING, INC. v. Chinatrust Bank (USA)
- Berman v. Cate
- People v. Nakai
- People v. Sanderson
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court
- People v. Murphy
- People v. Ochoa
- Inyo Citizens for Better Planning v. Inyo County Board of Supervisors
- Sanchez v. State of California
- Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.
- Lee v. Valverde
- Starlight Ridge South Homeowners Assn. v. Hunter-Bloor