Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Isom
- The Sierra Club v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/2
- Inland Oversight Committee v. City of Ontario
- Contra Costa County Children & Family Services Bureau v. R.G.
- Kelly-Lieras v. Lieras CA1/2
- People v. Erica R.
- Cueto v. Dozier CA1/2
- San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. O.F.
- People v. Nelson
- People v. Amato CA1/2
- Barker v. Fox & Associates
- People v. Hardin CA1/2
- Howard v. GC Services CA1/2
- People v. Powell CA1/2
- Sequeira v. Lincoln National Life Insurance
- People v. Gallardo
- In re Marriage of Siegel
- United States v. Brimager
- People v. Scott CA1/2
- People v. Lyons CA1/2
- People v. Miller CA1/2
- People v. Cowart
- Bridges v. City of Wildomar
- People v. Johnson
- People v. Warner CA1/2