Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Rey Sanchez Investments v. Superior Court CA4/2
- San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. B.H.
- Wong v. Barber CA1/2
- Lanz v. Goldstone
- People v. Bahena CA1/2
- Harrison v. City of Rancho Mirage
- People v. Valladares CA1/2
- Schneer v. Llaurado
- People v. Johnson
- People v. Webb CA1/2
- Ramos v. Westlake Services
- People v. Amanda A.
- People v. Valladares CA1/2
- In re Martinez
- People v. Soares CA1/2
- Duarte v. Freeland CA1/2
- Ramos v. Westlake Services CA1/2
- Norris v. Equity Bancorp CA1/2
- People v. Bell CA1/2
- Cueto v. Dozier
- Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. M.O.
- Medina v. Metropolitan Interpreters & Translators, Inc.
- People v. Linn
- Stephens v. Alta Bates Summit Medical Center CA1/2
- Maxon v. Initiative Legal Group CA1/2