Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Baker v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Diego
- Public Guardian of Mendocino County v. Jesse G.
- People v. Grohs CA1/2
- People v. Zarate CA1/2
- People v. Endsley
- In re Christopher S. CA1/1
- People v. Brown
- People v. Simon CA4/2
- United States v. Ramos
- People v. Hawkins CA4/2
- Jackson v. Superior Court of Riverside County
- People v. Deegan
- People v. Ludtke CA1/2
- People v. Randolph CA4/2
- People v. Dool CA4/2
- In re Juliana J. CA1/2
- People v. Garcia CA1/2
- Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.
- In re Marriage of Hall & Frencher
- People v. Miller CA4/2
- People v. Oviedo CA4/2
- People v. Young CA1/2
- Sanford v. Rasnick
- In re E.N. CA1/2
- People v. Young CA1/2