Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Ram CA1/2
- Cal. Public Utilities Com. v. Super. Ct.
- Hjelm v. Promestheus Real Estate Group CA1/2
- People v. Kilgore CA1/2
- People v. Prado CA1/2
- People v. Ram CA1/2
- Tetzner v. Hippler CA1/2
- Public Utilities Commission v. Superior Court of San Francisco County
- People v. Adelmann
- People v. S.S. CA1/2
- Schellinger Brothers v. Cotter
- Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'n
- People v. Abarca
- Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Ass'n v. Hazelbaker
- In re S.M. CA1/2
- People v. Disa
- People v. Hamernik
- People v. Mutter
- People v. Smith
- People v. Jones
- People v. Heath CA1/2
- Unigard Ins. Co. v. Harco National Ins. Co. CA1/2
- People v. Nia People CA1/2
- In re Larry N. CA1/2
- People v. Davis CA1/2