Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Dain CA1/2
- People v. Williams CA1/2
- People v. Tamrat CA1/2
- People v. Saner CA1/2
- People v. James
- Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.
- Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.
- Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/2
- Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/2
- People v. Osbourn CA1/2
- L.W. v. Superior Court CA1/2
- Pilliod v. Monsanto Co.
- People v. Peterson CA1/2
- Marriage of Stupp and Schilders CA1/2
- In re A.G. CA1/2
- In re A.G. CA1/2
- People v. Bankers Ins. Co.
- In re Valdez CA1/2
- People v. Hernandez CA1/2
- People v. Clotfelter
- People v. McInnis
- People v. Micheletti CA1/2
- People v. McCloud
- People v. McCloud CA1/2
- In re S.M. CA1/2