Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Gajanan v. City and County of S.F.
- In re E.P. CA1/2
- People v. Peppers-Valdovina CA1/2
- In re K.B. CA1/2
- People v. Pantoja
- Gajanan v. City and County of S.F. CA1/2
- People v. Wilson CA1/2
- People v. Pantoja CA1/2
- Qiu v. Saint Francis Memorial Hospital CA1/2
- People v. Cassidy CA1/2
- People v. James CA1/2
- In re E.P. CA1/2
- Hogan v. DeAngelis Construction CA1/2
- In re Cesar G.
- Hutcheson v. Superior Court
- Tramil v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/2
- Marriage of Stupp and Schilders CA1/2
- People v. Casillas CA1/2
- People v. Martinez CA1/2
- In re Clare M. CA1/2
- Jane Does v. Salesforce.com CA1/2
- People v. Shelton CA1/2
- Sinkiewicz v. Skyline 83 Batavia Investors CA1/2
- People v. Ponder CA1/2
- People v. Tamrat CA1/2