Miller
C-
98% — 52.0 of 53 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 56% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Westport Village etc. v. Khanna CA1/2
- People v. Shivalila CA1/2
- Sarkany v. West CA1/2
- Sarkany v. West CA1/2
- Sarkany v. West
- People v. Cook CA1/2
- Bluford v. Timm CA1/2
- People v. Broussard CA1/2
- People v. Moreno CA1/2
- People v. Vance CA1/2
- People v. Caparaz
- Turo v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Jaimes-Mendoza CA1/2
- Frances C. v. Superior Court CA1/2
- People v. Mota-Avendano CA1/2
- Sarwari v. Lodin CA1/2
- Allman v. Aldrich CA1/2
- A.C. v. M.N. CA1/2
- People v. Harris CA1/2
- People v. Hernandez CA1/2
- People v. Harper CA1/2
- People v. Padilla-Martel
- Wong v. Restoration Robotics
- Greenberg v. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CA1/2
- Gajanan, Inc. v. City and County of S.F.