Michael W. Mosman
Judge, District Court, D. Oregon 2003–
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 16% of 51 graded judges, but ten orders are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
9cases reviewed on appeal
1opinions authored
1panels sat on (not as author)
—8 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 6 reversed in part 1 reversed 1
Areas
By year: 2016 3 · 2020 2 · 2011 2 · 2019 1 · 2018 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Andrew Grimm v. City of Portland
- Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Ventex Co., Ltd.
- Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.
- Roderich Bott v. Jeffrey Edelson
- Rubicon Global Ventures, Inc. v. Chongqing Zongshen Grp.
- Maria Gutierrez v. Carolyn Colvin
- Maria Gutierrez v. Carolyn Colvin
- Maria Gutierrez v. Carolyn Colvin
- Miller v. OREGON BD. OF PAROLE SUPERVISION
- Miller v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision