Michael Imhoff
B+
76% — 38 of 50 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 24% of 306 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
39cases reviewed on appeal
11%reversed, in whole or part, of 36 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 32 reversed 3 writ granted 1 writ denied 1 reversed in part 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2022 9 · 2016 7 · 2021 6 · 2023 5 · 2015 5 · 2014 3 · 2020 2 · 2013 1 · 2010 1 ·
Analysis
72reviewed cases analysed
189rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
7cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- In re L.L. CA4/1
- In re P.S. CA4/1
- H.C. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- In re A.R. CA4/1
- In re M.S. CA4/1
- In re E.F. CA4/1
- In re S.A. CA4/1
- In re G.S. CA4/1
- In re V.M. CA4/1
- In re A.M. CA4/1
- In re K.K. CA4/1
- In re M.V.
- In re Mi.Q. CA4/1
- In re M.V. CA4/1
- In re E.W. CA4/1
- In re S.P. CA4/1
- In re A.W. CA4/1
- In re E.R. CA4/1
- In re S.S. CA4/1
- In re H.R. CA4/1
- In re N.S.
- In re N.S. CA4/1
- B.B. v. Super. Ct.
- In re Isaiah S.
- In re S.P. CA4/1