McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Rubio CA4/1
- In re Williams CA4/1
- People v. Marcus CA4/1
- People v. Sypho CA4/1
- People v. Noland CA4/1
- People v. Phyfiher CA4/1
- Marriage of Yermian CA4/1
- Marriage of Lakdawala CA4/1
- Kalicki v. ETrade Bank CA4/1
- E.C. v. B.F. CA4/1
- People v. Gonsalves CA4/1
- San Diegans etc. v. Har Construction
- People v. Mendivil CA4/1
- People v. Miller CA4/1
- Haslerig v. Dyson CA4/1
- Marr. of Brandes
- People v. Flores CA4/1
- People v. Podgurski CA4/1
- Holmes v. Cal. Victim Compensation & Gov. Claims Bd.
- In re D.P. CA4/1
- San Diegans for Open Government v. Har Construction CA4/1
- Marriage of Brandes
- City of San Diego v. Caryon Properties CA4/1
- People v. Albin CA4/1
- People v. Powers CA4/1