McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Townsend v. Townsend
- People v. Bankers Insurance Co.
- In Re Vasquez
- Tritek Telecom, Inc. v. Superior Court
- Surrey v. TRUEBEGINNINGS, LLC
- In Re Esperanza C.
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Laura C.
- Gong v. RFG Oil, Inc.
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Elizabeth N.
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Hunsberger
- In Re Kristen B.
- In Re Viray
- People v. Duncan
- Searles Valley Minerals Operations, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
- People v. Superior Court
- Otay River Constructors v. San Diego Expressway
- People v. QUITIQUIT
- Cates v. California Gambling Control Commission
- Cadle Co. II, Inc. v. Sundance Financial, Inc.
- Patel v. LIEBERMENSCH
- Lawrence v. Barona Valley Ranch Resort & Casino
- Canova v. Trustees of Imperial Irrigation District Employee Pension Plan
- Tyrone W. v. Superior Court
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court
- San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. Superior Court